Our Approach
The same four-stage sequence, every engagement.
Consistency is what makes new practices stick after we leave. Every engagement — whether it’s one service or a full transformation — runs through the same four stages, in the same order.
Stage by Stage
From audit to handover
Each stage closes with a defined output before the next one begins — nothing runs in parallel that shouldn’t.
Discover
1–2 weeksWe audit how your projects actually run today — not how the org chart says they run. That means reviewing live project files, sitting in on planning and status meetings, and mapping where cost and time are being lost.
- ＋Current-state process map
- ＋Cost & schedule leakage findings
- ＋Stakeholder & decision-rights map
- ＋Prioritized findings report
Plan
2–3 weeksWe design the governance model, delivery method, and schedule baseline for your portfolio — sized to your team’s capacity and matched to your industry’s contract and regulatory conditions, not a generic template.
- ＋Governance & PMO operating model
- ＋Delivery method selection
- ＋Schedule & budget baseline
- ＋Risk register framework
Execute
One full project cycleWe embed the new framework on live projects, working alongside your team through their first full cycle — from kickoff through a stage-gate review — rather than handing over documentation and stepping back.
- ＋On-the-job coaching
- ＋Live stage-gate reviews
- ＋Change-control in practice
- ＋Weekly variance tracking
Optimize
1–2 weeksWe review outcomes against the baseline set in Stage 02 — schedule variance, cost variance, risk exposure — and hand over a system your team can run independently, with no ongoing dependency on us.
- ＋Baseline vs. actuals review
- ＋Process refinements
- ＋Handover documentation
- ＋Internal owner sign-off
The Difference
What changes by the end of Stage 04
Without a system
- –Status tracked in scattered spreadsheets and chats
- –Scope changes agreed verbally, rarely logged
- –Risk discussed after it becomes a problem
- –Budget variance found at project close
- –Delivery approach varies by project lead
With P6Dynamics
- ＋Status reviewed on a fixed reporting cadence
- ＋Scope changes routed through a change-control process
- ＋Risks logged and reviewed against a register
- ＋Budget variance flagged against early-warning thresholds
- ＋One delivery method, applied consistently